daemons and heretics will fall before us!

I know, there is yet another topic about daemons...

but NOW there is the official codex also here in italy (and I think it's so all over the world, am I right?), so why don't we assemble here all the tactics and tricks we can imagine to stops are sworn enemies??

first of all, there's some points that must be analyzed:

- GK special rule: you know what I mean, daemonettes, plaguebearers, bloodletters and horrors will still return in game after we've destroyed them? and the daemon beasts, what?!?! there's no more the slot for daemons as in the previous CSM codex, so what happen now? I think that only nurglins can return in battle, or not?

- Mystics: I'm sure I won't go to battle without two of them per inquisitor... now they're really interesting: daemons enter in play by deep strike?? well, we can full them with psi-bolts before they enter reality!! this make my army not-fully GK, but who cares??

- Sanctuary: 4 inquisitors with a retinue with 3 servitors with heavy bolters, sage (or hyerophant) and 2 mystics and the possibility to be un-targeted... ok, now, where do I have to shoot?

psycannons... tons of psycannons is what we need!

After reading the raw rules.

Only nurglings have sustaned attack against grey knights.

Sanctuary owns.

But i will still loose if i play against them, becouse as always.

1) Everyone else have better rules.

2) Everyone else is cheaper!

So that's 100% percent sure that Daemonettes and Bloodletters are not considered 'packs' and won't be returning to combat? *wipes sweaty beads off forehead*

Exactly, i read the deamon CODEX and looked for packs.

No packs found.

Then i read the daemonhunters codex and looked up what counts as deamons.

Interesting stuff.
Read that section, the only deamons they mention are nurglings and deamon packs have sustained attack.

But possessed is also deamons if your read there.

Look it up for yourself, say what you think.
Page 20, daemons terminology.

And psykers is interesting too.

well, there is a problem if we use RAW: Daemon Princes... now, a Daemon Prince (if we read pag.20 of our codex) it's NOT a daemon, only Greater Daemon (OK), Daemon packs (lost in the Warp), Daemon Beasts (anymore??), Nurglings (OK), Possessed Vehicles (OK), Avatar (OK), Possessed (OK), and Chaos Lords with Daemonic Stature (lost) or 50+ Daemonic gifts (lost)...
so, Daemon Prince it's no more a Daemon: the power of RAW!

@albedoc: In C:CSM the DP is no daemon, that´s right. But in C:Daemons they´re counting as daemons.

that's cool!

Point is, our new nemesis is called Ku'gath, the plaugefather.

He spawns nurglings every turn on 4+.

Brother_Marine wrote:Well lads, over the past couple of months there has been a ton of suggestions about the rules you guys think should be in the new codex( if they make one) for knights and I think it's time that we put together a final one to send in to GW(saves me having to read it all ).

Anyway here's how it works, discuss what rules you all agree on in the new thread made by ALbedoc- http://greyknights.forumotion.com/40k-general-discussion-f15/daemons-and-heretics-will-fall-before-us-t289.htm

Once you firmly agree on one, pick somebody to post it here and I will assess the reasonability of the rule. If it's good i'll add it to a document I will create. Once you guys think there are enough rules then I will submit this to the lads at GW or even better, to snowfire. ^_^

Anyway there are gonna be strict rules on the posts made in this thread and I will delete all posts which are spam or stupid discussions. Keep it clean or sod off

Enjoy lads.

thanks!

we have tons of ideas in other posts!

time to consider it again!

Ok i'll tell you what, how bout I make a new thread for discussing rules so that there is not further confusion?